MOMOYO KAIJIMA OF ATELIER BOW WOW

While at first glance some projects could be writ­ten off at pure for­mal­ism, each project is anchored by a gen­uine con­sid­er­a­tion of the inter­nal inhab­it­able envi­ron­ment. The spa­tial com­plex­ity, par­tic­u­larly in the res­i­den­tial projects, results in a new way of liv­ing. Based on their ideas sur­round­ing the evo­lu­tion of gen­er­a­tional sub­di­vided land in Japan, the project House Tower exem­pli­fies this. Tak­ing a 42.29sqm site and sup­ply­ing a fam­ily home with a total floor area of 65.28sqm, while simul­ta­ne­ously only cre­at­ing a build­ing foot­print of 18.44sqm takes skill. It takes even greater skill to pro­duce such a build­ing with gen­uine moments of spa­tial delight and gen­eros­ity. Liv­ing spaces flow into each other ver­ti­cally and cre­ate sub­tly ele­gant vol­umes that artic­u­late the pro­gram over the split-levels. The idea appears in con­crete and glass, dis­tilled to the point where form rep­re­sents pro­gramme, the his­tory of the city and the social processes that have led to this type of hous­ing being nec­es­sary. The fin­ish­ing of the project is of the usual high stan­dard, but it is the recon­sid­er­a­tion of the high den­sity hous­ing typol­ogy that is par­tic­u­larly interesting.

Kai­jima explained how this ver­ti­cally works effec­tively in her own house. “In my case for House for Ate­lier Bow Wow, now we have a 12m dif­fer­ence from bot­tom to top. This kind of house is very inter­est­ing. I try to give con­nec­tiv­ity, but the per­sonal expe­ri­ence is more 1 cor­ner, 1 cor­ner, 1 cor­ner. That means you feel a not so strong con­tact. You feel some­one is there, but not so dis­turb­ing. The ver­ti­cal is a very inter­est­ing connection.”

The prac­tice man­ages to con­vey their con­cern with the occu­pant through their draw­ings by adding a per­spec­ti­val pro­jec­tion to plans and sec­tions. These draw­ings show the occu­pants sleep­ing, eat­ing and gen­er­ally liv­ing in the space. These draw­ings are not sim­ply ink sketches that show a stylised image of the vol­ume. These are highly detailed con­struc­tion draw­ings that also take on the duty of com­mu­ni­cat­ing tex­ture, light and other tac­tile issues that are scarcely seen within a CAD draw­ing. Another key fea­ture of these draw­ings is that they show an under­stand­ing of con­text in rela­tion to the client. Ate­lier Bow-Wow’s archi­tec­ture is not an imag­in­ing of an ide­al­is­tic liv­ing envi­ron­ment lit­tered with mag­a­zine cutouts. They are con­cerned with pro­duc­ing a direct response to client needs that doesn’t rely on plac­ing a neu­tral ‘flex­i­ble’ gallery back­drop. Why should the occu­pant have to buy new furniture?

To facil­i­tate the suc­cess­ful deliv­ery of such spaces Bow-Wow con­duct dis­cus­sions with their clients about their pre­vi­ous spa­tial expe­ri­ences. What their pre­vi­ous homes have been like, what they enjoyed and didn’t enjoy about their work­spaces. These dis­cus­sions lead to con­sid­er­a­tion of how the spaces effect behav­iour of the occu­pants, result­ing in a reeval­u­a­tion of the way in which peo­ple con­duct their lives. One inter­est­ing thing about the work that Ate­lier Bow-Wow pro­duces is that its qual­ity is not linked to its con­text or scale. There is also no defined aes­thetic style to tell the viewer that the project has come from Bow-Wow. Instead, a way of work­ing is present in the body of work that defines the unique­ness of their clients.

Every client is look­ing for some­thing
dif­fer­ent. That’s why our design is very
dif­fer­ent for each project. We always try to find new things in the local area. We use a method­ol­ogy of research but always adapt and change. The object is the same but the approach is different.”

When asked whether or not Bow-Wow gets to choose its clients the answer is “basi­cally we don’t choose. We give a kind of con­di­tion because we need time or bud­get etc. If project doesn’t fit the con­di­tions then it’s very sim­ple, we don’t do it.” It seems that the noto­ri­ety that gen­er­ates a per­pet­ual work cycle has reached a crit­i­cal mass. Kai­jima does point out that most of their clients are archi­tec­turally knowl­edge­able prior to con­tact­ing them.  They are also often from cre­ative fields them­selves and as such are not strangers to the cre­ative process. This aware­ness allows the pair to start one step ahead as it were. Which in turn allows them to push the client and their brief fur­ther with the time and bud­get pro­vided. It also means that these clients have made a dis­tinct and edu­cated deci­sion to engage a prac­tice like Bow-Wow for their project, and as such are expect­ing an chal­leng­ing response.

Ate­lier Bow-Wow is a prac­tice that is based on dis­cus­sion. On the idea that what is around us is worth inter­ro­gat­ing and that archi­tec­ture can be both a lens for view­ing the soci­ety in which we live, as also a mech­a­nism for chang­ing that soci­ety. “I like to talk to peo­ple through the archi­tec­ture issue. Maybe the sub­ject could be another issue but we always try to look for the rela­tion­ship to archi­tec­ture and the soci­ety or cul­ture. Archi­tec­ture is always help­ing me to under­stand what is hap­pen­ing in a dif­fer­ent city or society.”